top of page

Who Cares? You Can Tell By Walking

Walking is one of our most natural, daily actions. Now, a new study led by a Tohoku University researcher suggests that walkers use step synchronization as a form of non-verbal social communication. The results lend credence to the effects of psychological traits on movement interaction between humans.

Published in PLOS ONE, the study results demonstrate how people's traits and first impression affect their nonverbal communication, i.e. synchronous walking.

In order to conduct the study, researchers divided participants into groups. In total, ten single-gender groups were formed -- five female and five male. Group members took turns being paired up with other members, and they walked together along a quiet, barrier-free path. They wore voice recorders, and motion sensors disguised as GPS devices recorded their walking movements.

Researchers carried out the experiment under three conditions: a half silent walk half conversation condition where participants did not speak for half of the journey, yet conversed on the way back; a silent walk condition where participants did not converse for the entirety of the journey; and lastly, a non-walking condition where participants did not walk and sat quietly filling in a questionnaire in a classroom.

Participants had no prior knowledge of each other, and were asked to rate their impression of their partners before and after each walk using the interpersonal judgment scale (IJS). Furthermore, researchers misled participants about the true nature of the study to prevent them from intentionally synchronizing their steps.

The results revealed an increase in the impression ratings for the two groups of participants who walked together, but not for the group of participants who simply spent time together. This suggests that walking side-by-side, even without verbal communication, is sufficient to alter the social relation between two strangers. Results also showed that conversations further enhanced impressions for participants who were allowed to talk. Ultimately, the experiment successfully dissociated the contribution of verbal communication from walking step synchronization, which was inseparable in previous studies.

The researchers also found that pairs with a better first impression had greater synchronization in their steps -- particularly for female participants. In addition to social relation, personal traits are also important. Female pairs, compared to male pairs, exhibited higher walking synchrony in this experiment. There is also an age effect -- older participants tend to synchronize with their partners more in walking. Participants with lower autistic tendencies synchronize better than pairs of higher autistic tendencies.

"It is very surprising for us to discover that a person's traits and our first impressions are reflected in the subtle action of walking. I think most people are not even aware that their steps are synchronized with other people as they walk," said Dr. Chia-huei Tseng, an associate professor at the Research Institute of Electrical Communication (RIEC) at Tohoku University. "It was previously known that a person's physical parameters such as height and weight affect how their movements interact with others. Now we know psychological traits also have an effect."

"There is a growing awareness of the validity of interpersonal interaction research in real-world scenarios, but daily natural environments are rich in their contextual information, making experiment control a challenge," said Dr. Miao Cheng, a post-doc researcher at NTT Communication Science Laboratories. "Our study is important because it is an approach to make the most use of an ecological paradigm while using scientific experimental method to control possible confounding variables to examine the function of implicit body synchrony."

Story Source:

Materials provided by Tohoku University.

Journal Reference:

  1. Miao Cheng, Masaharu Kato, Jeffrey Allen Saunders, Chia-huei Tseng. Paired walkers with better first impression synchronize better. PLOS ONE, 2020; 15 (2)

20 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All
bottom of page